October 2006 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Oct 2 01:43:31 EST 2006
Ending: Sat Oct 28 05:27:25 EST 2006
Messages: 90

• [K42-discussion] Questions and comments about lazyReOpen + a patch for lazyReOpen   Orran Y Krieger
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] GCC4 -- more virtual destructors   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Fixed GCC warning for mixing signed and unsigned ints   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] reordered include to avoid redefine of symbol offsetof   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] I'm unsure about the following patch   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] I'm unsure about the following patch: [PATCH] Removed extern declaration of exceptionLocal which isn't actually being used anywhere   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] lkKernIncs include multiple files that define offsetof without checks. Added a check to undef it if it was already defined. This indicates that the includes should be scrutinized more closely, but for now it works.   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Added another ifdef->undef for offsetof which gets   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] These macros declare functions as both 'extern' and 'static'. This is strongly discouraged by the c++ spec and gcc 4 will not allow it. Instead, iso c++ suggests wrapping your extern functions in anonymous namespaces. See ISO-14882 7.3.1.1. Compiles correctly with both gcc 3 and gcc 4.1.   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] These macros declare functions as both 'extern' and 'static'. This is strongly discouraged by the c++ spec and gcc 4 will not allow it. Instead, iso c++ suggests wrapping your extern functions in anonymous namespaces. See ISO-14882 7.3.1.1. Compiles correctly with both gcc 3 and gcc 4.1.   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] yet another offsetof ifdef->undef   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Added another ifdef->undef for offsetof which gets   Michal Ostrowski
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Added another ifdef->undef for offsetof which gets   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Christopher Yeoh
• [K42-discussion] GCC4 toolchain progress   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] GCC4 toolchain progress   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] Patches related to GCC 4   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Patches related to GCC 4   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Added another ifdef->undef for offsetof which gets   Michal Ostrowski
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Added another ifdef->undef for offsetof which gets   Paul H. Hargrove
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Andrew Baumann
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Will Schmidt
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Andrew Baumann
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Bryan S Rosenburg
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Livio Soares
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Bryan S Rosenburg
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] c++ -> c calling conventions and assembly   Bryan S Rosenburg
• [K42-discussion] I'm unsure about the following patch: [PATCH] Removed extern declaration of exceptionLocal which isn't actually being used anywhere   Bryan S Rosenburg
• [K42-discussion] I'm unsure about the following patch: [PATCH] Removed extern declaration of exceptionLocal which isn't actually being used anywhere   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] These macros declare functions as both 'extern' and 'static'. This is strongly discouraged by the c++ spec and gcc 4 will not allow it. Instead, iso c++ suggests wrapping your extern functions in anonymous namespaces. See ISO-14882 7.3.1.1. Compiles correctly with both gcc 3 and gcc 4.1.   Bryan S Rosenburg
• [K42-discussion] process linux getfirst/next pid patch   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] Volatile directories and revalidation patch   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] fsfile locked_purge patch   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] Boot / K42 / Cell   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] SLOF/PAPR/K42   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] process linux getfirst/next pid patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Volatile directories and revalidation patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] fsfile locked_purge patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] Status of patches "volatile dir" and "enumeration of pids"   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Network subsystem tieins?   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] Network subsystem tieins?   Michal Ostrowski
• [K42-discussion] Network subsystem tieins?   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Livio Soares
• [K42-discussion] Minor makefile patches pushed to git   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] SLOF/PAPR/K42   Jimi Xenidis
• [K42-discussion] Boot / K42 / Cell   Robert Wisniewski
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Donour Sizemore
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Matthew J. Barrick
• [K42-discussion] Next Error Number   Robert Wisniewski
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Jimi Xenidis
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Eric V Van hensbergen
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Matthew J. Barrick
• [K42-discussion] mambo on parallels   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Patrick G. Bridges
• [K42-discussion] SLOF/PAPR/K42   Amos Waterland
• [K42-discussion] Exokernel / Device drivers   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] Problems booting the git tree under the simulator   Livio Soares
• [K42-discussion] process linux getfirst/next pid patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Volatile directories and revalidation patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] K42 Wiki upgrade   Christopher Yeoh
• [K42-discussion] [PATCH] Problem with install_targets   Livio Soares
• [K42-discussion] The Holy Grail in High Perf Computing ?   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] The Holy Grail in High Perf Computing ?   BUELL, DUNCAN A
• [K42-discussion] C-To-FPGA   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] C-To-FPGA   Volodymyr Kindratenko
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] C-To-FPGA   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] [Fastos] The Holy Grail in High Perf Computing ?   Jimi Xenidis
• [K42-discussion] [Fastos] The Holy Grail in High Perf Computing ?   Ronald G Minnich
• [K42-discussion] [Fastos] C-To-FPGA   Ronald G Minnich
• [K42-discussion] [Fastos] The Holy Grail in High Perf Computing ?   Jimi Xenidis
• [K42-discussion] [Fastos] C-To-FPGA   Timothy Miller
• [K42-discussion] Fiasco / SLOF / OPEN Dual 970MP/CPC945 Game Platform!   William DUCK
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] C-To-FPGA   Rick Pancoast
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Will Schmidt
• [K42-discussion] Linux Dynamic Upgrade   Andrew Baumann
• [K42-discussion] Proc dir root patch   Patrick Bozeman
• [K42-discussion] change to hwtools (warning for site toronto)   Maria Butrico
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] Re: [Fastos] C-To-FPGA   Pedro Diniz
• [K42-discussion] [Openfpga] C-To-FPGA   Dan Poznanovic
• [K42-discussion] fsfile locked_purge patch   Dilma DaSilva
• [K42-discussion] Proc dir root patch   Dilma DaSilva

Last message date: Sat Oct 28 05:27:25 EST 2006
Archived on: Tue Jul 14 23:07:25 EST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...