sorry! ;) See my reply at the right location!<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">T Ziomek</b> <<a href="mailto:ctz001@email.mot.com">ctz001@email.mot.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">[top-posting fixed :-) ]<br><br><br>On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Wade Maxfield wrote:<br>><br>> On 8/24/06, Peter Ryser <
<a href="mailto:peter.ryser@xilinx.com">peter.ryser@xilinx.com</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Wade,<br>>><br>>> are you sure that you did not build your hardware with evaluation cores of<br>>> the licenses? If you are using the evaluation licenses the hardware (FPGA
<br>>> design) will stop working after a certain amount of time and you will see a<br>>> lock-up.<br>><br>> Good question. How long before lockup? The only core that should be<br>> licensed is the ethernet, and I know it was sysgened on a system with a
<br>> license. This is the Xilinx reference design for the ml403 board.<br><br>When we were using the eval version of Xilinx's 10/100 EMAC it would time-<br>out after 8 hours (and the kernel would panic since our root fs was NFS-
<br>mounted).<br><br>If your only [to-be-]licensed core is Ethernet, then I take it you're using<br>the UARTLite, or a non-Xilinx UART? We used Xilinx's 16550-compatible UART,<br>which is licensed, but I never ran with the eval version of that IP block
<br>and so have no idea how long it will function before shutting down.</blockquote><div><br><br> We are doing an evaluation right now. We have operational 8 hours 55 minutes so far and counting on the Xilinx 16550 compatible uart. I think that is the cause of the problem for us, but not sure so far.
<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Tom<br>--<br>A: Because it breaks the logical |<br> flow of the message. | Email to user 'CTZ001'
<br> | at '<a href="http://email.mot.com">email.mot.com</a>'<br>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? |</blockquote><div><br>x<>y<br> A2. but only for algebraic. RPN likes it that way.
<br> <br> </div><br></div><br>