<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Andrei Konovalov wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid44A560D1.9050509@ru.mvista.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
<pre wrap="">I use this version only because I want to implement the Temac driver in the
link of
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2006-March/022365.html">http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2006-March/022365.html</a> It
looks that the patches are specific for that version.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There is nothing special in the TEMAC driver that binds it to 2.6.16-rc5.
The patch was generated against and tested with that kernel version. That's all.
The patch will probably not apply cleanly to the more recent kernels. But
otherwise it should work.
In other words, feel free to use that TEMAC patch with the recent kernel.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I am trying to get a local link version of the hard TEMAC that is
part of the V4 FX FPGA working against a 2.6 Kernel. Would this be an
appropriate patch for that ?<br>
Is it even close ?<br>
<br>
There are so many different Xilinx (and other) TEMACs floating
around and so many permutation of those that my head is fogged in.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Dave Lynch DLA Systems
Software Development: Embedded Linux
717.627.3770 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dhlii@dlasys.net">dhlii@dlasys.net</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.dlasys.net">http://www.dlasys.net</a>
fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774
Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein
</pre>
</body>
</html>