[PATCH v2 -- fixed changelog] [POWERPC] Add support for Rev. B of PowerPC 440SPe

[Eugene Surovegin]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 05:20:28PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > I think look-up tables are fine. It's not a fast path, is it?
> 
> Nope, that would be fine.  I'll definitely cut down on the code
> duplication -- I'm just not sure what will end up being cleanest.  I
> don't see that much difference between a switch and a look-up table
> for finding the base DCR index for a particular port.

OK, I was just wanted to make sure you were aware that mfdcr/mtdcr 
supported run-time specified DCR number (from that code it wasn't 
clear).

-- 
Eugene