[RFC 4/4] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 08/08/2011 10:49 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 10:59 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:52:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/06/2011 06:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>>>>>> flexcan driver needs the clk_get, clk_get_rate, etc functions
>>>>>> to work.  This patch provides the minimum functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch has to go via the powerpc git tree. Added
>>>>> linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org on CC.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt at sgi.com>
>>>>>> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de>
>>>>>> To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg at grandegger.com>
>>>>>> To: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300 at freescale.com>
>>>>>> Cc: socketcan-core at lists.berlios.de
>>>>>> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1010rdb.c |   78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> NAK.
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't look right at all.  We should be doing something based on the device tree node that isn't board specific.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Bhaskar has a version of flexcan support that he's been working on cleanup up for upstream.
>>>
>>> That version may be similar to what is in the freescale BSP which puts
>>> the clock functions inside flexcan.c
>>>
>>> The powerpc arch already provides a means for individual boards to provide
>>> the clock functions.  I am not posting this patch here for acceptance
>>> for powerpc and I am sure I will get feedback there when I post to
>>> their mailing list.  I am posting it here only to show that the flexcan
>>> developers earlier assertion that this can and should be done in the arch
>>> tree is correct and will work for the p1010 assuming we can get changes
>>> into the arch/powerpc directory to implement these clk_* functions.
>>
>> My point is that I don't think they should live in the arch code.  The clk_* functions you want to implement are tied more the FlexCAN IP than anything arch specific.  As such I believe they should be in the driver.
>>
>> For example when FSL has a P9999 with FlexCAN on it, we should NOT have to add any arch code to support it.
> 
> The Flexcan is found on ARM and now also on PowerPC SOCs. My current
> understanding is that the ability to set the clock source and divider is
> only available on PowerPC SOCs and therefore it's clearly arch specific
> and should go to arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c if it's common for all
> PowerPC platforms. What do you think?

There is a bit in the CAN-Controller that selects the clock (at least on
arm). The current driver just supports the bus clock. Support for the
other, the oscillator clock, has not been implemented so far.

IIRC the oscillator clock has a frequency that results in worse standard
timing than the bus clock.

cheers, Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20110808/eb5414a7/attachment.pgp>