[K42-discussion] [PATCH] Fix branches which need to use new EXTC macro

[Dilma DaSilva]

Hi Donour,

I can't apply this patch. (Previous patches you sent were generated
with diff -ru, this one with diff -git, so maybe I just don't know how 
to apply it).
When I run patch with --verbose I get:

Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
<text deleted>
Patching file lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S using Plan A...
Hunk #1 FAILED at 40.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S.rej

And this Hunk failure with rej generation goes on for all patches in
the file.

dilma

Donour Sizemore writes:
 > Signed-off-by: donour at cs.unm.edu <donour at cs.unm.edu>
 > ---
 >   lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S      |    2 +
 >   lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/mediateMethods.S    |    4 +-
 >   .../scheduler/arch/powerpc/DispatcherDefaultAsm.S  |   40 
 > ++++++++++++-----------
 >   lib/libc/sync/arch/powerpc/BLockAsm.S              |    8 ++--
 >   lib/libc/usr/arch/powerpc/entry.S                  |    2 +
 >   5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
 > 
 > diff --git a/lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S 
 > b/lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S
 > index eb579ba..0a65427 100644
 > --- a/lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S
 > +++ b/lib/libc/cobj/sys/arch/powerpc/defaultFuncs.S
 > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ CODE_ENTRY(defaultFuncCommon)
 >   	la	r3,STK_PARAM0(r1)		// first param:  &this
 >   	mr	r4,r12				// second param:  method number
 >   	stdu	r1,-(STK_SIZE+(13*8))(r1)	// push frame
 > -	bl	C_TEXT(GenericDefaultFunc)	// call generic function
 > +	bl	CXX_EXTC_TEXT(GenericDefaultFunc)	// call generic function
 >   	la	r1,(STK_SIZE+(13*8))(r1)	// pop frame
 >   	ld	r0,STK_LR(r1)			// restore link register
 >   	mtlr	r0
[ rest deleted]