[K42-discussion] virtual destructors
Orran Y Krieger
okrieg at us.ibm.com
Sat Jul 8 05:01:38 EST 2006
k42-discussion-bounces+okrieg=us.ibm.com at ozlabs.org wrote on 07/07/2006
01:41:22 PM:
> That doesn't appear to work in this case. More specifically, even adding
> an operator delete(void*) to that macro, the symbol still doesn't get
> defined.
In meeting, so maybe being stupid, but if you look at:
http://www.tug.org/tex-archive/graphics/sam2p/c_lgcc3.cpp
I think you need to define an implementation of that, since we are not
linking with the standard libraries. So, you have to define an
implementation of _ZdlPv
i.e., something like:
extern "C" void _ZdlPv (void*);
void _ZdlPv XFREE_CODE()
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/k42-discussion/attachments/20060707/a6828218/attachment.htm
More information about the K42-discussion
mailing list