[K42-discussion] Re: Possible benefit of running K42 on Cell CBE ...
Michal Ostrowski
mostrows at watson.ibm.com
Thu Jan 12 09:41:16 EST 2006
We'll be updating to 2.6.13 or so. Newer Linux kernels deprecate
devfs, which k42 currently depends on. Furthermore, ppc64 arch code has
been merged with ppc to create "powerpc". This is a fundamentally
invasive change that we don't have the time to track.
--
Michal Ostrowski <mostrows at watson.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 13:28 -0700, Matthew Barrick wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2005, at 05:02 Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> > If you wanted SPU support then you would have to take the LinuxBPA
> > changes en-masse and update our k42 to use the newer kernel code.
> > Linux is a moving target, so _after_ the current update is complete
> > (which is a background task for us) it may be another few weeks or few
> > months.
> >
> > Another concern is that user apps (the PU component) communicate with
> > the SPU via Linux sysfs. K42 does not normally use sysfs, so this
> > would take a few weeks to get that interchange correct.
>
> Could we get some more information on the Linux updates that are
> planned? In particular what version of Linux will the k42 linux tree be
> updated to be close to and what sub-systems will be updated/ignored. I
> understand it's a background task, but if it's possible to get a vague
> time estimate it'd be appreciated.
>
> I'm asking because I'm working on getting basic Infiniband support on
> k42 based the OpenIB project, and lot of their stuff depends on the
> newer kernel stuff, and it sounds like if someone's working on updating
> the Linux tree to something more recent, it'd be best to hold off on my
> work until the update is done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> matthew barrick
> barrick at cs.unm.edu
> _______________________________________________
> K42-discussion mailing list
> K42-discussion at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/k42-discussion
More information about the K42-discussion
mailing list